Review



rotarod treadmill  (Med Associates Inc)


Bioz Verified Symbol Med Associates Inc is a verified supplier
Bioz Manufacturer Symbol Med Associates Inc manufactures this product  
  • Logo
  • About
  • News
  • Press Release
  • Team
  • Advisors
  • Partners
  • Contact
  • Bioz Stars
  • Bioz vStars
    • 96
      Buy from Supplier

    Structured Review

    Med Associates Inc rotarod treadmill
    Rotarod Treadmill, supplied by Med Associates Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 96/100, based on 999 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/rotarod treadmill/product/Med Associates Inc
    Average 96 stars, based on 999 article reviews
    rotarod treadmill - by Bioz Stars, 2026-06
    96/100 stars

    Images



    Similar Products

    rotarod treadmill  (Med Associates Inc)
    96
    Med Associates Inc rotarod treadmill
    Rotarod Treadmill, supplied by Med Associates Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 96/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/rotarod treadmill/product/Med Associates Inc
    Average 96 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    rotarod treadmill - by Bioz Stars, 2026-06
    96/100 stars
    		  Buy from Supplier
    rotarod le8200 panlab harvard apparatus  (Panlab)
    86
    Panlab rotarod le8200 panlab harvard apparatus
    Rotarod Le8200 Panlab Harvard Apparatus, supplied by Panlab, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 86/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/rotarod le8200 panlab harvard apparatus/product/Panlab
    Average 86 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    rotarod le8200 panlab harvard apparatus - by Bioz Stars, 2026-06
    86/100 stars
    		  Buy from Supplier
    rotarod treadmill  (Muromachi Kikai)
    86
    Muromachi Kikai rotarod treadmill
    Rotarod Treadmill, supplied by Muromachi Kikai, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 86/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/rotarod treadmill/product/Muromachi Kikai
    Average 86 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    rotarod treadmill - by Bioz Stars, 2026-06
    86/100 stars
    		  Buy from Supplier
    five lane mouse rotarod  (Med Associates Inc)
    96
    Med Associates Inc five lane mouse rotarod
    Smo bidirectionally impacts motor learning (A) Structure of individual <t>rotarod</t> trials, performed 10 times per day. (B) Average latency to fall ( top ) and best-fit performance curves to criterion ( middle and bottom ) for Smo L/L :ChATCre +/− ( left, bottom ) and SmoM2 C/- :ChATCre +/− ( right, bottom ) versus respective controls (middle). (C) Average slope of individual best-fit performance curves for Smo L/L :ChATCre +/− and control mice ( n = 8 per genotype; Shapiro-Wilk test indicated lack of normality, p < 0.01; Mann-Whitney U test, p > 0.05). (D) Average number of days to reach criterion for Smo L/L :ChATCre +/− and control mice ( n = 8 per genotype; Brown-Forsythe test indicated unequal variances, p < 0.01; Welch-corrected unpaired two-tailed t test, ∗ p < 0.05). (E) Average slope of individual best-fit performance curves for SmoM2 C/- :ChATCre +/− and control mice ( n = 9–10 per genotype; F test indicated unequal variances, p < 0.01; Welch-corrected unpaired two-tailed t test, p > 0.05). (F) Average number of days to reach criterion for SmoM2 C/- :ChATCre +/− and control mice ( n = 9–10 per genotype; Shapiro-Wilk test indicated lack of normality, p < 0.01; Mann-Whitney U test, p > 0.05). (G) Slope comparison between control mouse strains ( n = 8–9 per strain; Shapiro-Wilk test indicated lack of normality, p < 0.01; Mann-Whitney U test, p > 0.05). (H) Best-fit slopes normalized to background strain ( n = 8–17 per genotype; Shapiro-Wilk test indicated lack of normality, p < 0.01; Kruskal-Wallis test, ∗ p < 0.05; post hoc Dunn’s multiple comparisons test: ∗ p < 0.05). (I) Average latency to fall post-criterion, normalized to background strain ( n = 8–17 per genotype; one-way ANOVA: main effect, F(2, 26) = 1.36, p > 0.05).
    Five Lane Mouse Rotarod, supplied by Med Associates Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 96/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/five lane mouse rotarod/product/Med Associates Inc
    Average 96 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    five lane mouse rotarod - by Bioz Stars, 2026-06
    96/100 stars
    		  Buy from Supplier
    rotarod apparatus  (Sanbio Inc)
    86
    Sanbio Inc rotarod apparatus
    Smo bidirectionally impacts motor learning (A) Structure of individual <t>rotarod</t> trials, performed 10 times per day. (B) Average latency to fall ( top ) and best-fit performance curves to criterion ( middle and bottom ) for Smo L/L :ChATCre +/− ( left, bottom ) and SmoM2 C/- :ChATCre +/− ( right, bottom ) versus respective controls (middle). (C) Average slope of individual best-fit performance curves for Smo L/L :ChATCre +/− and control mice ( n = 8 per genotype; Shapiro-Wilk test indicated lack of normality, p < 0.01; Mann-Whitney U test, p > 0.05). (D) Average number of days to reach criterion for Smo L/L :ChATCre +/− and control mice ( n = 8 per genotype; Brown-Forsythe test indicated unequal variances, p < 0.01; Welch-corrected unpaired two-tailed t test, ∗ p < 0.05). (E) Average slope of individual best-fit performance curves for SmoM2 C/- :ChATCre +/− and control mice ( n = 9–10 per genotype; F test indicated unequal variances, p < 0.01; Welch-corrected unpaired two-tailed t test, p > 0.05). (F) Average number of days to reach criterion for SmoM2 C/- :ChATCre +/− and control mice ( n = 9–10 per genotype; Shapiro-Wilk test indicated lack of normality, p < 0.01; Mann-Whitney U test, p > 0.05). (G) Slope comparison between control mouse strains ( n = 8–9 per strain; Shapiro-Wilk test indicated lack of normality, p < 0.01; Mann-Whitney U test, p > 0.05). (H) Best-fit slopes normalized to background strain ( n = 8–17 per genotype; Shapiro-Wilk test indicated lack of normality, p < 0.01; Kruskal-Wallis test, ∗ p < 0.05; post hoc Dunn’s multiple comparisons test: ∗ p < 0.05). (I) Average latency to fall post-criterion, normalized to background strain ( n = 8–17 per genotype; one-way ANOVA: main effect, F(2, 26) = 1.36, p > 0.05).
    Rotarod Apparatus, supplied by Sanbio Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 86/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/rotarod apparatus/product/Sanbio Inc
    Average 86 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    rotarod apparatus - by Bioz Stars, 2026-06
    86/100 stars
    		  Buy from Supplier
    rotarod apparatus  (San Diego Instruments)
    86
    San Diego Instruments rotarod apparatus
    Smo bidirectionally impacts motor learning (A) Structure of individual <t>rotarod</t> trials, performed 10 times per day. (B) Average latency to fall ( top ) and best-fit performance curves to criterion ( middle and bottom ) for Smo L/L :ChATCre +/− ( left, bottom ) and SmoM2 C/- :ChATCre +/− ( right, bottom ) versus respective controls (middle). (C) Average slope of individual best-fit performance curves for Smo L/L :ChATCre +/− and control mice ( n = 8 per genotype; Shapiro-Wilk test indicated lack of normality, p < 0.01; Mann-Whitney U test, p > 0.05). (D) Average number of days to reach criterion for Smo L/L :ChATCre +/− and control mice ( n = 8 per genotype; Brown-Forsythe test indicated unequal variances, p < 0.01; Welch-corrected unpaired two-tailed t test, ∗ p < 0.05). (E) Average slope of individual best-fit performance curves for SmoM2 C/- :ChATCre +/− and control mice ( n = 9–10 per genotype; F test indicated unequal variances, p < 0.01; Welch-corrected unpaired two-tailed t test, p > 0.05). (F) Average number of days to reach criterion for SmoM2 C/- :ChATCre +/− and control mice ( n = 9–10 per genotype; Shapiro-Wilk test indicated lack of normality, p < 0.01; Mann-Whitney U test, p > 0.05). (G) Slope comparison between control mouse strains ( n = 8–9 per strain; Shapiro-Wilk test indicated lack of normality, p < 0.01; Mann-Whitney U test, p > 0.05). (H) Best-fit slopes normalized to background strain ( n = 8–17 per genotype; Shapiro-Wilk test indicated lack of normality, p < 0.01; Kruskal-Wallis test, ∗ p < 0.05; post hoc Dunn’s multiple comparisons test: ∗ p < 0.05). (I) Average latency to fall post-criterion, normalized to background strain ( n = 8–17 per genotype; one-way ANOVA: main effect, F(2, 26) = 1.36, p > 0.05).
    Rotarod Apparatus, supplied by San Diego Instruments, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 86/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/rotarod apparatus/product/San Diego Instruments
    Average 86 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    rotarod apparatus - by Bioz Stars, 2026-06
    86/100 stars
    		  Buy from Supplier
    rotarod  (Zhongshi Duqing Biotech Co Ltd)
    86
    Zhongshi Duqing Biotech Co Ltd rotarod
    Smo bidirectionally impacts motor learning (A) Structure of individual <t>rotarod</t> trials, performed 10 times per day. (B) Average latency to fall ( top ) and best-fit performance curves to criterion ( middle and bottom ) for Smo L/L :ChATCre +/− ( left, bottom ) and SmoM2 C/- :ChATCre +/− ( right, bottom ) versus respective controls (middle). (C) Average slope of individual best-fit performance curves for Smo L/L :ChATCre +/− and control mice ( n = 8 per genotype; Shapiro-Wilk test indicated lack of normality, p < 0.01; Mann-Whitney U test, p > 0.05). (D) Average number of days to reach criterion for Smo L/L :ChATCre +/− and control mice ( n = 8 per genotype; Brown-Forsythe test indicated unequal variances, p < 0.01; Welch-corrected unpaired two-tailed t test, ∗ p < 0.05). (E) Average slope of individual best-fit performance curves for SmoM2 C/- :ChATCre +/− and control mice ( n = 9–10 per genotype; F test indicated unequal variances, p < 0.01; Welch-corrected unpaired two-tailed t test, p > 0.05). (F) Average number of days to reach criterion for SmoM2 C/- :ChATCre +/− and control mice ( n = 9–10 per genotype; Shapiro-Wilk test indicated lack of normality, p < 0.01; Mann-Whitney U test, p > 0.05). (G) Slope comparison between control mouse strains ( n = 8–9 per strain; Shapiro-Wilk test indicated lack of normality, p < 0.01; Mann-Whitney U test, p > 0.05). (H) Best-fit slopes normalized to background strain ( n = 8–17 per genotype; Shapiro-Wilk test indicated lack of normality, p < 0.01; Kruskal-Wallis test, ∗ p < 0.05; post hoc Dunn’s multiple comparisons test: ∗ p < 0.05). (I) Average latency to fall post-criterion, normalized to background strain ( n = 8–17 per genotype; one-way ANOVA: main effect, F(2, 26) = 1.36, p > 0.05).
    Rotarod, supplied by Zhongshi Duqing Biotech Co Ltd, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 86/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/rotarod/product/Zhongshi Duqing Biotech Co Ltd
    Average 86 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    rotarod - by Bioz Stars, 2026-06
    86/100 stars
    		  Buy from Supplier
    rotarod  (Panlab)
    86
    Panlab rotarod
    Smo bidirectionally impacts motor learning (A) Structure of individual <t>rotarod</t> trials, performed 10 times per day. (B) Average latency to fall ( top ) and best-fit performance curves to criterion ( middle and bottom ) for Smo L/L :ChATCre +/− ( left, bottom ) and SmoM2 C/- :ChATCre +/− ( right, bottom ) versus respective controls (middle). (C) Average slope of individual best-fit performance curves for Smo L/L :ChATCre +/− and control mice ( n = 8 per genotype; Shapiro-Wilk test indicated lack of normality, p < 0.01; Mann-Whitney U test, p > 0.05). (D) Average number of days to reach criterion for Smo L/L :ChATCre +/− and control mice ( n = 8 per genotype; Brown-Forsythe test indicated unequal variances, p < 0.01; Welch-corrected unpaired two-tailed t test, ∗ p < 0.05). (E) Average slope of individual best-fit performance curves for SmoM2 C/- :ChATCre +/− and control mice ( n = 9–10 per genotype; F test indicated unequal variances, p < 0.01; Welch-corrected unpaired two-tailed t test, p > 0.05). (F) Average number of days to reach criterion for SmoM2 C/- :ChATCre +/− and control mice ( n = 9–10 per genotype; Shapiro-Wilk test indicated lack of normality, p < 0.01; Mann-Whitney U test, p > 0.05). (G) Slope comparison between control mouse strains ( n = 8–9 per strain; Shapiro-Wilk test indicated lack of normality, p < 0.01; Mann-Whitney U test, p > 0.05). (H) Best-fit slopes normalized to background strain ( n = 8–17 per genotype; Shapiro-Wilk test indicated lack of normality, p < 0.01; Kruskal-Wallis test, ∗ p < 0.05; post hoc Dunn’s multiple comparisons test: ∗ p < 0.05). (I) Average latency to fall post-criterion, normalized to background strain ( n = 8–17 per genotype; one-way ANOVA: main effect, F(2, 26) = 1.36, p > 0.05).
    Rotarod, supplied by Panlab, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 86/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/rotarod/product/Panlab
    Average 86 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    rotarod - by Bioz Stars, 2026-06
    86/100 stars
    		  Buy from Supplier
    accelerated rotarod test  (Panlab)
    86
    Panlab accelerated rotarod test
    Smo bidirectionally impacts motor learning (A) Structure of individual <t>rotarod</t> trials, performed 10 times per day. (B) Average latency to fall ( top ) and best-fit performance curves to criterion ( middle and bottom ) for Smo L/L :ChATCre +/− ( left, bottom ) and SmoM2 C/- :ChATCre +/− ( right, bottom ) versus respective controls (middle). (C) Average slope of individual best-fit performance curves for Smo L/L :ChATCre +/− and control mice ( n = 8 per genotype; Shapiro-Wilk test indicated lack of normality, p < 0.01; Mann-Whitney U test, p > 0.05). (D) Average number of days to reach criterion for Smo L/L :ChATCre +/− and control mice ( n = 8 per genotype; Brown-Forsythe test indicated unequal variances, p < 0.01; Welch-corrected unpaired two-tailed t test, ∗ p < 0.05). (E) Average slope of individual best-fit performance curves for SmoM2 C/- :ChATCre +/− and control mice ( n = 9–10 per genotype; F test indicated unequal variances, p < 0.01; Welch-corrected unpaired two-tailed t test, p > 0.05). (F) Average number of days to reach criterion for SmoM2 C/- :ChATCre +/− and control mice ( n = 9–10 per genotype; Shapiro-Wilk test indicated lack of normality, p < 0.01; Mann-Whitney U test, p > 0.05). (G) Slope comparison between control mouse strains ( n = 8–9 per strain; Shapiro-Wilk test indicated lack of normality, p < 0.01; Mann-Whitney U test, p > 0.05). (H) Best-fit slopes normalized to background strain ( n = 8–17 per genotype; Shapiro-Wilk test indicated lack of normality, p < 0.01; Kruskal-Wallis test, ∗ p < 0.05; post hoc Dunn’s multiple comparisons test: ∗ p < 0.05). (I) Average latency to fall post-criterion, normalized to background strain ( n = 8–17 per genotype; one-way ANOVA: main effect, F(2, 26) = 1.36, p > 0.05).
    Accelerated Rotarod Test, supplied by Panlab, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 86/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/accelerated rotarod test/product/Panlab
    Average 86 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    accelerated rotarod test - by Bioz Stars, 2026-06
    86/100 stars
    		  Buy from Supplier

    Image Search Results


    Smo bidirectionally impacts motor learning (A) Structure of individual rotarod trials, performed 10 times per day. (B) Average latency to fall ( top ) and best-fit performance curves to criterion ( middle and bottom ) for Smo L/L :ChATCre +/− ( left, bottom ) and SmoM2 C/- :ChATCre +/− ( right, bottom ) versus respective controls (middle). (C) Average slope of individual best-fit performance curves for Smo L/L :ChATCre +/− and control mice ( n = 8 per genotype; Shapiro-Wilk test indicated lack of normality, p < 0.01; Mann-Whitney U test, p > 0.05). (D) Average number of days to reach criterion for Smo L/L :ChATCre +/− and control mice ( n = 8 per genotype; Brown-Forsythe test indicated unequal variances, p < 0.01; Welch-corrected unpaired two-tailed t test, ∗ p < 0.05). (E) Average slope of individual best-fit performance curves for SmoM2 C/- :ChATCre +/− and control mice ( n = 9–10 per genotype; F test indicated unequal variances, p < 0.01; Welch-corrected unpaired two-tailed t test, p > 0.05). (F) Average number of days to reach criterion for SmoM2 C/- :ChATCre +/− and control mice ( n = 9–10 per genotype; Shapiro-Wilk test indicated lack of normality, p < 0.01; Mann-Whitney U test, p > 0.05). (G) Slope comparison between control mouse strains ( n = 8–9 per strain; Shapiro-Wilk test indicated lack of normality, p < 0.01; Mann-Whitney U test, p > 0.05). (H) Best-fit slopes normalized to background strain ( n = 8–17 per genotype; Shapiro-Wilk test indicated lack of normality, p < 0.01; Kruskal-Wallis test, ∗ p < 0.05; post hoc Dunn’s multiple comparisons test: ∗ p < 0.05). (I) Average latency to fall post-criterion, normalized to background strain ( n = 8–17 per genotype; one-way ANOVA: main effect, F(2, 26) = 1.36, p > 0.05).

    Journal: iScience

    Article Title: The GPCR Smoothened on cholinergic interneurons modulates dopamine-associated acetylcholine dynamics, learning, and effort management

    doi: 10.1016/j.isci.2026.115324

    Figure Lengend Snippet: Smo bidirectionally impacts motor learning (A) Structure of individual rotarod trials, performed 10 times per day. (B) Average latency to fall ( top ) and best-fit performance curves to criterion ( middle and bottom ) for Smo L/L :ChATCre +/− ( left, bottom ) and SmoM2 C/- :ChATCre +/− ( right, bottom ) versus respective controls (middle). (C) Average slope of individual best-fit performance curves for Smo L/L :ChATCre +/− and control mice ( n = 8 per genotype; Shapiro-Wilk test indicated lack of normality, p < 0.01; Mann-Whitney U test, p > 0.05). (D) Average number of days to reach criterion for Smo L/L :ChATCre +/− and control mice ( n = 8 per genotype; Brown-Forsythe test indicated unequal variances, p < 0.01; Welch-corrected unpaired two-tailed t test, ∗ p < 0.05). (E) Average slope of individual best-fit performance curves for SmoM2 C/- :ChATCre +/− and control mice ( n = 9–10 per genotype; F test indicated unequal variances, p < 0.01; Welch-corrected unpaired two-tailed t test, p > 0.05). (F) Average number of days to reach criterion for SmoM2 C/- :ChATCre +/− and control mice ( n = 9–10 per genotype; Shapiro-Wilk test indicated lack of normality, p < 0.01; Mann-Whitney U test, p > 0.05). (G) Slope comparison between control mouse strains ( n = 8–9 per strain; Shapiro-Wilk test indicated lack of normality, p < 0.01; Mann-Whitney U test, p > 0.05). (H) Best-fit slopes normalized to background strain ( n = 8–17 per genotype; Shapiro-Wilk test indicated lack of normality, p < 0.01; Kruskal-Wallis test, ∗ p < 0.05; post hoc Dunn’s multiple comparisons test: ∗ p < 0.05). (I) Average latency to fall post-criterion, normalized to background strain ( n = 8–17 per genotype; one-way ANOVA: main effect, F(2, 26) = 1.36, p > 0.05).

    Article Snippet: Trials were conducted in a room with low ambient light and noise using a five-lane mouse rotarod (ENV-574M; Med Associates) programmed to accelerate linearly from 4 to 40 RPM over 300 seconds (preset speed setting #9).

    Techniques: Control, MANN-WHITNEY, Two Tailed Test, Comparison